Drone as First Responder (DFR) programs are transforming the way emergency services respond to incidents. What began as an experimental practice with pilots stationed on rooftops in the United States has now evolved into sophisticated, remotely operated networks using drone-in-a-box (DiaB) systems. This shift has not only improved response times but also reshaped how we approach the integration of unmanned systems into regulated airspace.

The Origin of DFR

The first DFR programs took shape in the U.S., where police departments began deploying drones from station rooftops or nearby locations to rapidly respond to 911 calls. These drones provided situational awareness before officers arrived on-scene, supporting safer and more efficient decision-making. These early deployments were still operated by pilots within visual line-of-sight (VLOS), typically stationed near the take-off location.

Scaling with Drone-in-a-Box Systems

As the technology matured, these programs expanded in scale and complexity. Drone-in-a-Box systems now enable fully remote operation, where a drone is housed in an automated docking station, ready to be dispatched within seconds. This opens up the ability to operate DFR programs 24/7 across multiple locations, even with limited personnel.

These systems are increasingly integrated with Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems, allowing drones to be automatically dispatched to incident locations as soon as an emergency call is registered. The result is a dramatic reduction in response time and enhanced situational awareness for first responders.

Regulatory Landscape: BVLOS and Atypical Airspace

The rise of DiaB systems introduces new regulatory challenges. Since the pilot is no longer physically co-located with the drone, these operations inherently fall under Beyond Visual Line-of-Sight (BVLOS) rules. BVLOS operations require significant additional mitigations due to the increased operational risk.

Europe: Atypical Airspace and Operational Mitigations

In Europe, regulators often allow DFR operations under SORA-based frameworks, particularly in Atypical Airspace. This means the operation is conducted in areas that are naturally shielded from other airspace users, such as:

• Close proximity to buildings or infrastructure

• Restricted or segregated airspace

• Controlled airspace with ATC coordination ensuring separation from manned aviation

Until a standard for Detect and Avoid (DAA) is fully defined, BVLOS operations are generally restricted to these kinds of environments. Additional mitigations include:

• Using dynamic population density data

• Integrating parachutes and FTS that comply with MoC 2512 and MoC 2511

• Rigorous remote pilot training and emergency procedures

• Technical validation of the operational volume (e.g. C2-link integrity, electromagnetic interference, etc.)

United States: Altitude-Based DAA Requirements

In the U.S., a similar pattern is emerging:

• BVLOS operations below 200 feet AGL often do not require DAA systems

• BVLOS operations up to 400 feet AGL typically require DAA capabilities

To meet these requirements, operators employ technologies such as:

• ADS-B receivers to detect manned air traffic

• Drone detection systems to identify nearby unmanned traffic

• Integration of DFR systems with UTM services and airspace awareness tools

Full Airspace Awareness: Combining Drone Enablement and C-UAS

To support BVLOS safety and compliance, many DFR programs are now combining Drone-in-a-Box technology with counter-UAS (C-UAS) systems. This allows for:

• Detection of non-cooperative drones

• Enhanced awareness of local air traffic

• Real-time deconfliction for safe mission execution

At AirHub, we are actively integrating our platform with systems such as SafeSky and various drone detection technologies to provide a full airspace picture for DFR operations.

Public vs. Commercial Operators: A Regulatory Divide

It's important to note that state operators (e.g. police departments) in the EU often benefit from more flexible regulatory conditions. In some member states, public safety agencies can conduct BVLOS operations in Class G airspace without DAA, provided they operate under state exemption rules.

On the other hand, commercial security companies are still required to operate in Atypical or segregated airspace and adhere strictly to SORA and EASA regulations. Until a harmonised DAA standard is introduced, this distinction is likely to remain.

How AirHub Supports DFR Operations

Whether you are a public agency or a commercial security provider, AirHub offers full-spectrum support for DFR programs:

Consultancy:

• SORA application and documentation (ConOps, OM, ERP, etc.)

• Strategy support and regulatory coordination

• Stakeholder engagement and training programs

Software:

• AirHub Drone Operations Center (DOC) for mission planning, real-time operations, and compliance

• Integration with drone detection and airspace awareness tools

• Risk assessment and checklist functionality

• Secure Data Mode, encrypted 4G service and SSO for privacy and access control

Final Thoughts

Drone as First Responder is no longer a future concept - it is a rapidly scaling reality. With the right technologies and regulatory strategies in place, DFR can drastically enhance public safety, security, and situational awareness. At AirHub, we are proud to support this evolution by delivering both the tools and expertise needed to make it work.

Interested in starting or scaling a DFR program? Contact our team to explore what is possible.